As a business leader or consultant, you’ll likely be involved in a number of game-changing, broad-scale initiatives — such as a sales organization restructuring, a partner program redesign, or a company-wide ERP roll-out. These efforts share some common characteristics: massive organizational change across multiple groups, redefinition of key business processes, significant resource requirements, and high executive visibility.
These make-or-break success factors can be easy to underestimate or overlook. While these factors may seem like basics, it’s surprising how often they are glossed over by busy people:
When leadership is splintered across multiple individuals and groups, it’s easy for things to fall apart. Decisions — even simple ones — can take weeks, stalling project momentum. Conflicting leadership guidance creates confusion among team members. Milestones are missed. In contrast, a single leader clarifies accountability, creates consistency, and accelerates decisions, allowing the project to maintain momentum and engagement.
Transformation efforts are hard. They don’t produce rapid results and typically involve heated discussions. They often require long hours. Given the challenges, leadership must continually reinforce that the effort is a top priority through demonstrated conviction and visible support. In most cases, the leader must dedicate significant personal time and hard work to keeping the effort on track. Without a committed leader, tough projects routinely fall by the wayside.
Even if a cross-organizational transformation effort has a single, committed leader, it cannot deliver on objectives without significant and dedicated resources. While the need for adequate investment may seem obvious, we have seen numerous cases where leadership overlooks this need.
Transformation efforts are inherently resource intensive; team members have to analyze business impacts, develop process revisions, revise job descriptions, and create trainings. As a result, these initiatives must be resourced to support the work effort required. Investments should be clearly sourced and assigned at the outset; otherwise the project team is forced to waste time continually asking for resources instead of completing project work. And if the team isn’t successful in securing resources? The effort dies on the vine.
In the same vein, a transformation effort cannot succeed if it is a side job. If transformation responsibilities are added on top of existing workloads, people’s day-to-day commitments will take precedence. When forming the initiative team, leaders must recognize the time restrictions by helping team members establish priorities and shift preexisting workloads. Only then will the team have the capacity and support necessary to effectively deliver on the mandate.
For many leaders, outcomes like tool functionality and enhancements aren’t all that exciting, but are incredibly important. Unless the operational environment is set up to support the transformation, the effort falters. In other words, you're setting up a team for failure if you ask employees to change without making the necessary systems, tools, and operations adjustments to enable the change.